passive repression
harder to discern where the problems are
worse then this movie by gibson of christ
at the end
then finally the brain shuts off
role of the anchor (hanger) and the victim
after a while the audience empathizes the victim
a 100 years later public tortures
were forbidden (officially barbarism - should be more human)
but is beginning of hiding the barbarity
prove the punishment and proceed the punishment
how they imprison
thing is not visible to audience
violence becomes abstract
abstractization -- another example, how the measures goes
if we describe the spectacles of the torture
then would hide them under the cloth
would not see the violence but hear the pain
again abstracting…
cannot place
cannot give a name
cannot
guillotine and other machines
no longer human relation with the hanger and the victim
machine is supposed to be more human
whole procedure of the spectacle
extension of the moment of the death
this extension is shortened for one second
don't have time to realize what has happened
from the theatrical point
in order to develop emotion need time
but in terms of philosophical thought need only logic and the second
your perception of death is different
when in second then don't realize
with the insitutionalization of aggression
we don't realize the aggression
its abstracted
why still support Stalin cause they don't believe that it was him who gave the orders
seperation of the ones who did it and the ideology
shameful justice
system gets seperated
people who support stalin still believe it was his enivornment and not him
anyone who was a danger to this system
neo-liberalism: aggression is not visible
it is seperated
displaced and fragmented
more and more difficult to grasp it.
to find the ones who we can punish, etc.
it is part of this democratic system that if you support the property only
the ones who are in power
will always be in profit
its just hidden
so complex in the structure
new human being
we want to create a new creative entrepeneur (if not you are a loser)
sustains the illusion that its 'ok' and nothing we can do
then goes to existentialist pathos
u lose your stomach -- when you think
opposed
ballet - we should develop to the angels
we get rid of the emotions
but doesn't mean that the emotions aren't manipulated in teh world
becomes a positivism
being inside the perception
inside of something
and not taking something to 'present' something
dance is always pushing you to expose yourself (rainer)
disconnect emotion and body and then connect in different way
expressionism does not work cause there is no cut , no space for reflection
aggression didn't dissappear just changed its form
FE just saw the circles --- was always the aggression, always the aggression
no in all these circles there is a development
develop tools of analalytical watching
have an opportunity
get aware of my own repressions
spalding grey -- talks about his own fuked up family, makes himself very transparanet and vulnerable
not expressionist one, is really a duration.. in order to reach the emotion
do manipulate the emotions
u as an artist do possess the power to manipulate emotion
then the question is what kind of emotion do you want to lead to
bourgoise left is portrayed by fassbinder as not really worth your time (but on the landscape)
later works are really dramas, really uncovers their tragedy
in order for us to have time to experience their
instead of rationalizing, hes uncovering, he lets us suffer
but within reflection
stays critical of certain characteriistics and ideology
how people remain 'unsocial' (let's say) and how fuked up it is
diary of a collaboration
this discussion
but interrupted by bringing out a new vacumn cleaner
and then another
is brought out which supplants the first one
can we discuss this because i think we are on a role here
then why don't you come here
i wish you would come here
don't have the money to do that
but you just inherited monies
